Skip to content
Working with an agency

GEO Agency Red Flags to Watch For

Eight warning signs in a GEO proposal or sales call, from guaranteed ChatGPT rankings to reports with no URLs, and what to ask instead.

By Jeremy ZavaAI-assisted, reviewed by Ibrahem Helal5 min read

The clearest GEO agency red flags are a guaranteed AI ranking, a citation report with no URLs behind it, and a refusal to say which AI engines are actually being tracked. Any one of these on a sales call is reason enough to ask harder questions before signing anything.

This list pairs with how to choose a GEO agency, which covers the full buying process start to finish. Use it to screen out the wrong vendors before you get to the right questions.

On this page

They guarantee specific ChatGPT or AI mentions

This is the single clearest red flag in the category. No agency, including us, controls what a third-party model generates for a given prompt on a given day — the same question asked two days apart can return different sources from the same assistant [3]. A guarantee is either a misunderstanding of how these systems work or a deliberate overpromise, and neither is a good foundation for a paid relationship. Can you guarantee ChatGPT mentions covers what an honest answer actually sounds like.

They can't name which AI engines they track

"AI search optimization" with no engines named is a phrase, not a service. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google's AI features behave differently enough that a serious agency tracks them separately, with different tactics for each. If a proposal or a call never gets more specific than "AI platforms," that's usually because nothing specific is actually being measured.

Their citation report has no URLs in it

A percentage with nothing behind it is not evidence. A real report names the exact pages an assistant cited, for which prompts, on which dates — numbers you could check yourself by asking the same question. A report that's just a chart with an upward line and no URLs is the AI-search version of a vanity metric.

What a credible answer looks like, versus a red flag
QuestionRed flag answerCredible answer
Can you guarantee mentions?"Yes, or your money back""No, but here's how we measure and improve the odds"
Which engines do you track?"All the AI platforms"Names ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini specifically
Can I see a report?A chart with no URLsNamed pages, prompts and dates
What's the contract length?12 months, no exit clauseMonth-to-month or a short initial term

They lock you into a long contract with no exit

A twelve-month term with no early-exit clause is a caution sign in any agency relationship, and more so here: the tooling and even the definitions in this field are still moving, and a vendor confident in their own results shouldn't need a full year of lock-in to prove it. Ask what happens if you want to leave at month three, and get the answer in writing before you sign, not after.

They reuse an SEO deck with "GEO" pasted on top

Watch for a pitch that's identical to a standard SEO retainer with the acronym swapped. If the deliverables list is backlinks, keyword rankings and a monthly blog post with no mention of crawler access, third-party citation outreach or AI-specific tracking, that's an SEO agency relabeling its service, not a team that's built a real GEO practice. GEO agency vs SEO agency walks through what actually differs between the two.

This isn't to say an SEO agency can't do good GEO work — some can, and doing both well is common. The problem is specifically the relabeling: a scope of work that hasn't changed at all except for the acronym on the cover page. Ask what, concretely, is different about the monthly work versus what they'd bill you for plain SEO, and expect a specific answer.

They price it suspiciously low for the scope described

A retainer priced well under what the described scope would actually cost to staff is worth a direct question. Crawler audits, page-level rewrites for AI extraction, and ongoing third-party outreach are real hours from a real person, and a price that doesn't cover those hours usually means one of two things is true: the work described isn't really happening every month, or it's the same SEO deliverables with a new name attached, which brings you back to the previous red flag. Neither is a reason to panic, but both are reasons to ask exactly how the hours break down.

They push scare tactics about being "invisible to AI"

Urgency framing — "your competitors are already being cited and you're not" — with no baseline data to back it up is a sales tactic, not a diagnosis. A legitimate agency runs a real baseline check first and shows you the actual gap, rather than asserting one to create pressure. Deceptive or unsubstantiated claims are exactly what advertising regulators warn against generally [2], and a GEO pitch is not exempt from that standard just because the product is new.

  1. Ask for the baseline before believing the pitch

    A real urgency claim comes with a specific citation-rate number for your site today, not a general statement about the category.

  2. Request the report format in writing

    Ask what a monthly report will contain before signing, and hold the agency to that exact format later.

  3. Get the exit terms confirmed before, not after

    A short initial term or a documented exit clause is a normal, reasonable ask — treat resistance to it as information.

They can't explain what a search-engine spam policy has to do with any of this

GEO work still touches pages that Google crawls and indexes, and a page built to game an AI answer with the same tricks that trip Google's spam policies — thin, auto-generated content chasing a keyword with no real value — risks both engines at once [1]. If an agency's technique for "getting cited" sounds indistinguishable from old-fashioned content spam, that's worth a direct question about how it avoids the same penalties.

They won't tell you what GEO can't do yet

The single most reassuring thing a real GEO agency will say is a clear "here's what we don't know how to guarantee yet." An agency that answers every question with total confidence and zero caveats is either new to the discipline or choosing not to be straight with you about its real limits — both worth knowing before you sign, and neither is something a polished deck will admit on its own.

If you want the fuller checklist for vetting on a live call, questions to ask a GEO agency covers that in more depth, and a free audit is a low-cost way to get a second, independent read on where you actually stand before committing to anyone.

Questions people also ask

  • Is a guaranteed ChatGPT ranking always a scam?

    Not necessarily a scam, but always a claim nobody can honestly back. No agency controls what a third-party model generates, so a flat guarantee means either the seller doesn't understand the mechanism or is choosing not to disclose that limit.

  • What's the fastest way to spot a fake GEO agency in a first call?

    Ask to see a real, current citation report with named URLs. A vendor with a working process can show one on the spot. One that can't, or stalls, is usually selling a rebadged SEO retainer.

  • Are long-term lock-in contracts a red flag for GEO specifically?

    They're a caution sign generally, and more so in GEO because the discipline and the tooling are still changing fast. A contract with no exit before month six is worth pushing back on.

  • Does a low price automatically signal a bad GEO agency?

    Not automatically, but a price far below what the visible scope of work would cost to actually staff is usually explained by one of two things: the work isn't really happening, or it's the same SEO retainer with GEO added to the name.

Sources

  1. Spam policies for Google web search — Google Search Central (checked 23 September 2026)
  2. Truth in Advertising — Federal Trade Commission (checked 23 September 2026)
  3. I tracked 13,184 AI citations across 4 LLMs: here's what I learned — Orbit Media Studios (checked 23 September 2026)

Got a GEO proposal that raised a red flag? Send it over.

Book a free 30-minute consultation with Ibrahem and Jeremy. We look at your site while we talk, and you leave with a prioritised plan.

Who wrote this

Jeremy ZavaCo-founder

Leads growth and client partnerships.

Works on: CRO, SEO

Reviewed before publishing by Ibrahem Helal, Co-founder.

Posts by Jeremy Zava

More on this